Our Knowledge, Resources & Publications

We are always learning through our work, and we seek to accelerate change more broadly by sharing our frameworks, approaches, and lessons learned.

Feature Report

Measuring Political Will


2016

A win often means getting the support of elected officials, and the Policymaker Rating method was designed to measure just that. This brief shares scenarios where this method was applied and modified to show what has worked (and what utterly failed).

Download
 

Data pager
Data pager
 Item 5 to 8 of 41
Page:of 11 GoItems Per Page
 
Data pager
Data pager
 Item 5 to 8 of 41
Page:of 11 GoItems Per Page
Briefs / Reports
2018

ORS Impact and Spark Policy Institute completed a rigorous study to understand when and how collective impact contributes to systems and population change. Looking across 25 initiatives working on different focus areas, the study looks at the contribution and outcomes of collective impact, the design and implementation of the collective impact approach, with a specific deep-dive into equity. The study also lifts up implications from the study as well as considerations for different audiences.

Download
Briefs / Reports
2017

Organizational Effectiveness at the David & Lucile Packard Foundation has long supported individual leaders and organizations in becoming stronger and more resilient. They’ve long had success in the short- and longer-term building the capacity of individual nonprofits working in their programmatic areas by supporting things like consultant support for strategic planning, fund development, or leadership development. In recent years, OE experimented with a new model, seeking to support social and environmental change on a larger scale by fostering relationships and networks instead of just supporting individual organizations. This new model, called Partnership Projects, are grants focused on cohorts of individual leaders or grantee organizations and are designed to build the capacity of participants while they learn from their peers and grow their networks. In early 2017, ORS Impact conducted an evaluation of nine such projects to understand the effectiveness of the cohort model of capacity building and whether participants built lasting relationships with other leaders or organizations to exchange resources and ideas, address shared issues, and act in concert to accomplish what cannot be accomplished individually. Findings suggest that Partnership Projects, like OE’s traditional grants, are effective for building capacity in the project focus area(s). The model has also demonstrated that participants experience the added benefits of learning from their peers and—in many cases—growing their networks. Our evaluation found Partnership Projects are a promising model for supporting capacity building, particularly when having grantees share information or collaborate (rather than work in isolation) is key to achieving impact. You can read our findings and recommendations about when the cohort model of capacity building is best suited, and how those designing and/or implementing cohort capacity-building projects can maximize the effectiveness of the model here .

Download
Briefs / Reports
2017

Advocacy evaluation as a field has lacked good, rigorous examples of how to examine the cause-and-effect relationship between advocacy and policy change. A non-experimental impact evaluation method that holds promise is contribution analysis.

Download
Briefs / Reports
2017

Is there a disconnect between the data you collect and the decisions you make?

Download